Category → development
Using VS.NET web application projects with both VS.NET 2008 and 2010 RTM
What a palaver. Prior to RTM you could use VS.NET 2008 and 2010 web application projects alongside each other with no issues (after having 2010 upgrade them). With RTM, you get horrible issues with the line:
<Import Project="$(MSBuildExtensionsPath32)\Microsoft\VisualStudio\
v10.0\WebApplications\Microsoft.WebApplication.targets" />
Added to the bottom of your .csproj files. After much soul searching I’ve found a solution with a bit of MSBuild cleverness. Turns out you can conditioanlly include MSBuild targets depending on the version of Visual Studio being used.
So, for each web application project in your solution:
- a) Have VS.NET 2010 upgrade your projects to the newer version.
- b) Replace the above line with:
<Import Project="$(MSBuildExtensionsPath32)\Microsoft\VisualStudio\ v9.0\WebApplications\Microsoft.WebApplication.targets"
Condition="'$(Solutions.VSVersion)' == '9.0'" /> <Import Project="$(MSBuildExtensionsPath32)\Microsoft\VisualStudio\ v10.0\WebApplications\Microsoft.WebApplication.targets"
Condition="'$(Solutions.VSVersion)' == '10.0'" />
- c) Blank out <FileUpgradeFlags></FileUpgradeFlags> which VS.NET 2010 has probably put “4.0” in, this will trip 2008 up otherwise.
- d) Blank out <UpgradeBackupLocation></UpgradeBackupLocation> in the same manner.
As long as you can then live with working with a seperate solution file for VS.NET 2010, you should be away and can stop annoying anyone else working on your files!
.NET Settings Providers
I’m researching different methods of persisting, updating and managing configuration in .NET, as I’ve become a bit tired of rolling my own static “Config” class.
Having used the newer Settings architecture (as opposed to the old fashioned non-typed AppSettings) on a small scale site, I’ve been interested in how it might be possible to extend these over a distributed system.
Turns out you can, the system is pluggable.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/8eyb2ct1.aspx
http://www.sellsbrothers.com/writing/default.aspx?content=dotnet2customsettingsprovider.htm
Over the next few weeks I’ll be exploring how this might benefit an application – especially in the area of not having to restart when writing to app.config files!
Sending E-Mails (the longer than usual story)
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2010/04/so-youd-like-to-send-some-email-through-code.html
Very interesting article (fewer and farther between unfortunately these days) from Jeff Atwood about some of their experiences with building Stack Overflow and sending out mails and having them actually arrive! Quite pertinent as I’m currently working in a similar area.
Essentially, firstly send mail from your client to: check-auth@verifier.port25.com and get a free report on basically what you’re missing from your setup. You can do this over and over again to get a picture for how you’re progressing.
Obviously the article goes into detail, but in summary:
1. Make sure the computer sending the email has a Reverse PTR record
2. Configure DomainKeys Identified Mail in your DNS and code
3. Set up a SenderID record in your DNS
Basically they are all a combination of adding the correct TXT and PTR records to your domain names, as well as generating a public/private key pair, signing your mails with the private one and making the public part available via DNS.
They use a commercial piece of software called Mailbee.NET to do the signing work, but this is possible using good old SmtpClient with something like this: http://tinisles.blogspot.com/2009/09/sending-dkim-email-from-c.html.
Not production code by any stretch of the imagination, and some of the work he does to build a CN and do the actual signing could be done using the built-in BCL classes but you get the picture. I’ll post again when I have this working.
ASP.NET MVC vs. Ruby on Rails
http://anders.janmyr.com/2010/04/aspnet-mvc-vs-rails3.html
Quite an interesting article on this, if extremely biased towards RoR.
A few salient points:
- RoR is entirely command line based, ASP MVC is obviously more tied to Visual Studio (although I would debate that as you could do everything by command line, ms build and notepad)
- Very similar in all basic respects.
- No analysis of more important and “edgy” factors such as model binding (ASP MVC is very good at this) and validation frameworks.
- I’m still jealous in some respects of RoR DB migrations – I wonder if there is a .NET based port of this going anywhere? I should lend a hand if so.
- Routing is a tie, both good.
- Pretty much parity beyond that (at least as far as the article is concerned).
MiniDumpWriteDump
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/debug/postmortemdebug_standalone1.aspx
I’m trying to come up with a standard and reliable way to trigger a core dump from within the logging/exception handling of a C# executable. The above article indicates that this should be possible, but it sounds as if making this work across platforms would be a fairly large nightmare.
If anyone has done anything similar to this, I’d be interested to see how you went about it, and if possible maybe we could share/release some code to make this easier.
Genius at Work
Here’s a Channel 9 interview with Anders Hejlsberg, the creator and head designer of C# as a language (as well as Delphi back in the day).
Interesting in that it examines some of the improvements in C# 4.0, as well as features that are being bandied around for even further out.
Also contains the best description of contra-variance and co-variance that I’ve seen so far.
http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Going+Deep/Expert-to-Expert-Anders-Hejlsberg-The-Future-of-C/
Database Versioning Strategies
http://flux88.com/blog/net-database-migration-tool-roundup/
Microblog to bring attention to this for myself in the future.
Strategies on how to maintain scripts for database versioning, and how upgrades and downgrades can be managed in a much more automated and reliable fashion than manual scripting.
AnthemNxt HttpModule and other fun and games
I’ve spent most of today doing some more work on AnthemNxt to continue simplifying the code base and making the framework even more fool proof to work with.
- Separated out the single project into AnthemNxt.Core and AnthemNxt.Controls. For now development will concentrate on Core and further simplifying that. Any patches for Controls will be happily received however as I know many people have their own Anthem controls kicking about.
- Created a dedicated AnthemNxt.Tests web application project which I’ll repopulate with the old Anthem tests at some point, but for now I am using as the basis of my tests for a HttpModule that will simplify Anthem error handling.
- Separated script management out of AnthemNxt.Core.Manager into AnthemNxt.Core.ScriptManager with the intention of eventually allowing the use of this ScriptManager in place of the built in ASP.NET one no matter if you are in a callback or not.
- Created AnthemSection (configuration section handler for web.config) from where the old settings are now read and where any new settings will be placed.
- Created AnthemModule (which is now required to be included in web.config and will be reported as missing if so) which will be used to pave over the slightly manual way in which Anthem used to handle reporting errors back to the browser. The intention is that Application_Error will work identically as it does for postbacks to give you the chance to log information etc, yet redirects to error pages etc from within there will still be honoured using the callback scheme.
I’ve also added two controls of my own:
Error Handling and Exception Logging
I’ve been struggling with Anthem.NET for some time to work exactly how I would like (and expect) as regards to the event flow for an unhandled page exception.
In the original 1.5.1 release of Anthem, the Application_Error event was bypassed by a hook added in Manager.OnError as follows:
1: private void OnError(object source, EventArgs e)
2: {
3: if (IsCallBack)
4: {
5: _error = HttpContext.Current.Error.ToString();
6: HttpContext.Current.ClearError();
7: WriteResult(HttpContext.Current.Response, null, _error);
8: }
9: }
Which meant that any global logging (we use log4net) of an error that you do in Application_Error does not fire and so you end up with the unsatisfactory situation where errors in callbacks occur silently to your operations team whilst returning correct information back to the JS client portion of Anthem.
This can be worked around by writing a JS Anthem error handler that then calls an AJAX method which triggers a log of a message, but that is convoluted, inefficient and unrelhable and not an acceptable solution for me.
In the latest source of AnthemNxt I’ve removed the above OnError handler and let the exception proceed as a normal postback would (so my Application_Error handler DOES get hit now and I get exceptions fully logged).
However now there is a HTML error page returned to the JS client and not a valid JSON response because the OnUnload Anthem handler is never called (since the page rendering is hijacked due to the exception). Until I can write a HttpModule to overcome this and make AnthemNxt a true drop-in library, I’ve broken out the OnUnload AnthemNxt functionality so that it can be called from Application_Error:
1: private void OnUnload(object sender, EventArgs e)
2: {
3: CompleteRequest();
4: }
5:
6: public void CompleteRequest()
7: {
8: var res = HttpContext.Current.Response;
9:
10: // Handles inserting JS to do a redirect
11: if(Manager.IsCallBack && res.StatusCode == 302)
12: {
13: string href = res.RedirectLocation.Replace("\\", "\\\\").Replace("'", "\\'");
14: res.RedirectLocation = string.Empty;
15: res.Clear();
16: res.StatusCode = 200;
17:
18: var sb = new StringBuilder();
19: Manager.AddScriptForClientSideEval("window.location='" + href + "';");
20: JsonWriter.WriteValueAndError(sb, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, clientSideEvalScripts);
21: res.Write(sb.ToString());
22: res.End();
23: }
24: }
as so:
1: protected void Application_Error(object sender, EventArgs e)
2: {
3: log.Error(ex.Message, ex);
4:
5: // If we are in debug mode get the usual "yellow screen of death" up, makes debugging easier during development
6: if(!Manager.IsCallBack && HttpContext.Current.IsDebuggingEnabled) return;
7:
8: // Redirects to an error page - need to not end the request if this is a callback
9: // so that AnthemNxt can write a JS redirect into the JSON response
10: Response.Redirect(“~/error.aspx”, !Manager.IsCallBack);
11: if(Manager.IsCallBack) Manager.Current.CompleteRequest();
12: }
Hopefully with a HttpModule I can make this fully automatic, but for our purposes this is better than the existing behaviour for now :)
Anyone interested in contributing, whether it be patches, comments or just bugs please get in touch or use the Codeplex project.
anthem-nxt
http://www.codeplex.com/anthemnxt
Well I’ve finally done what I’ve been saying I’d do for quite some time now, forked the Anthem.NET project on sourceforge that has gone pretty stale. I’ve started a new codeplex project for the fork with which my immediate aims are to:
- Clean up the codebase
- Incorperate some community and personal bugfixes
- Drop support for .NET 1.1
- Make a beta code release
I’ve already released what I have as a 1.5.2 alpha release so that people just looking for the project can get started easily.
Longer term I’m looking to:
- Refactor the JS code so that it works as a jQuery plugin. Will give greater browser compatibility as well as reducing the size of anthem + jQuery overall (as anthem can use jQuery’s AJAX functionality). This will also make the code much more maintainable.
- Add much more stringent documentation and unit tests.
- Incorperate some new controls that have common uses.
- Find ways to allow easy use of jQuery effects with anthem callbacks
Please let me know what you think. I could do with all the help I can! :)
Recent Comments